Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Louis GARRASTEQUI, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner for the Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, an inmate, was charged in a misbehavior report with violating various prison disciplinary rules stemming from his participation in a riot in the recreation area of the correctional facility where he was confined. Petitioner pleaded guilty to disobeying a direct order and, following a disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of rioting, engaging in violent conduct and possession of a weapon.1 We reject petitioner's contention that the misbehavior report did not specify with particularity his role in the riot. The detailed misbehavior report specifically identified petitioner as a participant in the melee and established that all participants were throwing metal chairs or had hand-held weapons (see, Matter of Alvarez v. Coombe, 239 A.D.2d 810, 657 N.Y.S.2d 541). This evidence, together with the testimony of the correction officer who issued the report and witnessed the incident, provides substantial evidence to support the determination of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Calligros v. Great Meadow Correctional Facility, 246 A.D.2d 700, 666 N.Y.S.2d 520). Although petitioner maintained that he was not involved in the incident, this presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Alvarez v. Coombe, supra). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including that he was denied the right to call certain witnesses, have been reviewed and found to be either unpreserved for our review or lacking in merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
FOOTNOTES
1. Petitioner was also found not guilty of assault. Although petitioner was also charged with fighting and creating a disturbance, no disposition was made as to these charges.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 02, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)