Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Jorge BURGOS, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule which prohibits inmates from engaging in sexual acts. Received into evidence at petitioner's disciplinary hearing was the detailed misbehavior report authored by the facility librarian who observed petitioner masturbating at the end of a set of library shelves. This report, coupled with the librarian's corroborating testimony in which she explicitly described the incident, was sufficient to constitute substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Osborne v. McGinnis, 243 A.D.2d 882, 663 N.Y.S.2d 321). Petitioner's explanation for his conduct merely created a credibility issue which the Hearing Officer was free to resolve against him (see, Matter of Jiminez v. Berry, 203 A.D.2d 815, 612 N.Y.S.2d 974, lv denied 84 N.Y.2d 808, 621 N.Y.S.2d 517, 645 N.E.2d 1217). Finally, petitioner's contention that the Hearing Officer considered his prior conduct in assessing his credibility and as evidence of guilt finds no support in the record. While the record does show that the Hearing Officer did consider petitioner's history of similar behavior in determining the appropriate penalty, such consideration was proper (see, Matter of Edmonson v. Coombe, 247 A.D.2d 693, 668 N.Y.S.2d 508; Matter of Hart v. Coombe, 229 A.D.2d 754, 755, 645 N.Y.S.2d 901, lv. denied 89 N.Y.2d 802, 653 N.Y.S.2d 279, 675 N.E.2d 1232).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 09, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)