Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Calvin LEE, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF PAROLE et al., Respondents.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Graffeo, J.), entered December 5, 1997 in Ulster County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondents' motion to dismiss the petition for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and lack of personal jurisdiction.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging respondents' determination revoking his parole and imposing a term of imprisonment. Supreme Court granted respondents' motion to dismiss the petition for lack of personal jurisdiction and failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We affirm. Petitioner commenced this proceeding while his final parole revocation hearing was still pending and nearly two months before the parole revocation determination was rendered. Petitioner having failed to pursue an administrative appeal from the final determination prior to commencing this proceeding, and there being no indication that the claimed errors could not have been remedied in the administrative appeal process, the petition was appropriately dismissed (see, Matter of Boyer v. Chairman, New York State Parole Bd., 199 A.D.2d 584, 605 N.Y.S.2d 970; Matter of Trimaldi v. Superintendent of Washington Correctional Facility, 169 A.D.2d 960, 564 N.Y.S.2d 856). Finally, petitioner's unexplained failure to comply with the service requirements set forth in the order to show cause warranted dismissal of the petition on the additional ground of lack of personal jurisdiction (see, Matter of Wilder v. New York State Div. of Parole, 249 A.D.2d 606, 670 N.Y.S.2d 622; Matter of Arroyo v. Coombe, 239 A.D.2d 634, 657 N.Y.S.2d 373, lv. denied 90 N.Y.2d 812, 666 N.Y.S.2d 100, 688 N.E.2d 1382).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: July 09, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)