Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Valerie D. BULLARD, Respondent, v. ST. MARY'S HOSPITAL et al., Respondents; Special Funds Conservation Committee-Special Disability Fund, Appellant. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed July 11, 1996, which ruled, inter alia, that the Special Disability Fund was liable for reimbursement of the compensation and medical expenses paid to claimant after the first 104 weeks of her disability period.
Claimant was employed as a secretary at St. Mary's Hospital in the City of Rochester, Monroe County, when rheumatoid arthritis in both her hands and wrists compelled her to resign. The Workers' Compensation Board ultimately ruled that claimant had sustained an occupational disease that resulted in a permanent, partial disability and awarded compensation from March 27, 1991 onward. Pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 44, liability for claimant's benefits was apportioned among her last three employers, to wit, Rochester Savings Bank, Woodward Health Center and St. Mary's Hospital. This apportionment was based upon the finding that claimant had suffered from her occupational disease during her employment with each entity. The workers' compensation insurance carriers for the first two employers were directed to reimburse Sedgwick James of New York Inc., the carrier for St. Mary's Hospital, for their respective one-third shares of the benefits paid to claimant by Sedgwick James during the first 104 weeks of her disability. It was further ruled that the Special Funds Conservation Committee of the Special Disability Fund (hereinafter SDF) would reimburse Sedgwick James for compensation paid to claimant after the initial 104-week disability period (see, Workers' Compensation Law § 15[8][d] ).
On this appeal, SDF contends that inasmuch as the Board found St. Mary's Hospital to be only one-third responsible for claimant's disability, SDF should only be required to reimburse Sedgwick James for one-third of the award. We disagree. While Workers' Compensation Law § 44 permits apportionment of compensation among several employers, it makes clear that the total compensation due is recoverable from a claimant's last employer, here, St. Mary's Hospital. Inasmuch as Workers' Compensation Law § 15(8)(d) provides that a claimant's employer is to be reimbursed by SDF for any benefits payable after the first 104 weeks of disability and St. Mary's Hospital, by the plain and unambiguous terms of Workers' Compensation Law § 44, is responsible for the total compensation awarded by the Board here, we find nothing irrational in requiring SDF to reimburse Sedgwick James for the full amount of the award. We have considered the remaining contentions raised on appeal and find them to be without merit.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
CREW, Justice.
MIKOLL, J.P., and MERCURE, WHITE and YESAWICH, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 23, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)