Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., Appellant, v. Wilfredo WILLIAMS, Respondent.
Appeal by the People, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Minardo, J.), dated July 2, 1997, as granted that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to dismiss the first count of Indictment No. 1319/97, charging him with the crime of manslaughter in the second degree.
ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to dismiss the first count of Indictment No. 1319/97 charging him with manslaughter in the second degree is denied, that count of the indictment is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings.
The evidence adduced at the Grand Jury established that in the early morning hours of February 2, 1997, the defendant and a group of others left a restaurant located at 643 Franklin Avenue where they had been socializing. The defendant walked to his car which was parked further up on Franklin Avenue, a one-way street. The defendant entered his car and drove in reverse, i.e., the wrong way, at a speed of approximately 45 miles per hour for a distance of approximately 200 feet toward the group of people he had just left at the restaurant. The defendant's car swerved from one side of the street to another and hit the victim, causing her to suffer fatal injuries.
Contrary to the Supreme Court's determination, the People presented a prima facie case (see, People v. Galatro, 84 N.Y.2d 160, 163, 615 N.Y.S.2d 650, 639 N.E.2d 7), of manslaughter in the second degree in that they established that the defendant “recklessly caused the death of another” (Penal Law § 125.15 [1] ), i.e., the defendant was “aware of and consciously disregard[ed] a substantial and unjustifiable risk” (Penal Law § 15.05[3]; see, People v. Heinsohn, 92 A.D.2d 574, 459 N.Y.S.2d 329, affd. 61 N.Y.2d 855, 473 N.Y.S.2d 968, 462 N.E.2d 145).
Accordingly, the order must be reversed insofar as appealed from, and the count of the indictment charging the defendant with manslaughter in the second degree reinstated.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: August 03, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)