Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Rodney JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating various prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging an administrative determination finding him guilty of engaging in violent conduct, assaulting another inmate, making threats and committing a sex offense in violation of various prison disciplinary rules. Initially, we reject petitioner's contention that the Hearing Officer failed to make an independent assessment of the credibility of the confidential informants. The Hearing Officer, who personally interviewed the confidential informants, explicitly stated that the veracity of the confidential informants had been reviewed and their testimony was deemed credible (see generally, Matter of Ayala v. Coombe, 227 A.D.2d 752, 753, 642 N.Y.S.2d 98; Matter of Feneque v. Selsky, 188 A.D.2d 819, 820, 591 N.Y.S.2d 814).
We also reject petitioner's contention that he was denied his right to submit documentary evidence because the results of the rape test were unavailable at the time of the hearing. As noted by petitioner in his brief, the results of the rape test were made available to him after the hearing. Because the test results do not exclude petitioner as the perpetrator, he has failed to establish any prejudice resulting from their unavailability (see, Matter of Fitzgerald v. Coughlin, 191 A.D.2d 941, 942, 595 N.Y.S.2d 253, lv. denied 82 N.Y.2d 651, 601 N.Y.S.2d 580, 619 N.E.2d 658). Moreover, the misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the victim and the confidential informants, provide substantial evidence in the record to support the determination of guilt.
Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claim of Hearing Officer bias, have been examined and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 02, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)