Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. Damian J. McMANUS, Appellant.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay an uninsured motorist arbitration pending the deposition and independent medical examination of the claimant, and to change the venue of the arbitration from Kings County to Westchester County, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), dated March 17, 1997, which granted the application.
ORDERED that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which granted the application to change venue from Kings County to Westchester County and substituting therefor a provision denying that branch of the application; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the appellant.
The Supreme Court erred in determining that the petitioner insurance carrier was entitled to change the venue of the arbitration hearing. Pursuant to the American Arbitration Association rules, the arbitrator is to select the location of the hearing, and the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the arbitrator violated any of the applicable rules in selecting the location. In addition, courts are generally without power to void the determination of an arbitrator in the selection of the venue of an arbitration proceeding (see, Matter of D.M.C. Constr. Corp. v. Nash Steel Corp., 41 N.Y.2d 855, 393 N.Y.S.2d 709, 362 N.E.2d 260, revg. 51 A.D.2d 1040, 1043, 381 N.Y.S.2d 325, on dissenting opn. of Shapiro, J., at the App.Div.).
However, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in ordering a deposition and physical examination of the appellant in aid of the arbitration (see, CPLR 3102[c]; Hendler & Murray v. Lambert, 127 A.D.2d 820, 511 N.Y.S.2d 941; Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Wernick, 90 A.D.2d 519, 455 N.Y.S.2d 30).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 06, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)