Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Esther H. KUHNS, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 4, 2004, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
Claimant, a senior machine operator, left her job in December 2003 to care for her husband after he was discharged from the hospital. Her employer explained to claimant the option of taking family medical leave, but she nevertheless chose to quit her job. When she inquired about returning to her job the following March, she was informed that it was not available. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denied her application for unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant now appeals.
We affirm. We note that, absent a medically compelling reason, an employee who leaves employment to care for a sick relative will be considered to have voluntarily left his or her employment without good cause (see e.g. Matter of Munoz [Commissioner of Labor], 301 A.D.2d 1014, 754 N.Y.S.2d 704 [2003]; Matter of Perrotta [Hudacs], 207 A.D.2d 934, 616 N.Y.S.2d 561 [1994]; Matter of Pinto [Manufacturers Hanover Trust-Hudacs], 187 A.D.2d 902, 590 N.Y.S.2d 331 [1992] ). Here, there is no evidence that claimant was advised by her husband's physician that she needed to stop working to care for him. Claimant conceded that, although she was told that someone would need to attend to her husband upon his discharge from the hospital, she was unaware of the duration or extent of the care needed. Finally, claimant elected to quit her job rather than accept a medical leave offered by her employer. Under these circumstances, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board's decision that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause (see Matter of Pinto [Manufacturers Hanover Trust-Hudacs], supra at 903, 590 N.Y.S.2d 331).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 10, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)