Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Philip J. SIRLIN, respondent, v. TOWN OF NEW CASTLE, et al., appellants.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for false arrest and malicious prosecution, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), entered April 7, 2004, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
In reviewing a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, the factual allegations of the complaint must be deemed to be true, and the court must afford the plaintiff the benefit of all favorable inferences that can be drawn from the complaint (see Campaign for Fiscal Equity v. State of New York, 86 N.Y.2d 307, 318, 631 N.Y.S.2d 565, 655 N.E.2d 661; Leon v. Martinez, 84 N.Y.2d 83, 87-88, 614 N.Y.S.2d 972, 638 N.E.2d 511; Johnson v. Kings County Dist. Attorney's Off., 308 A.D.2d 278, 763 N.Y.S.2d 635). Applying this standard here, we reject the defendant's contention that the complaint fails to state a cause of action, inter alia, to recover damages for false arrest and malicious prosecution. The factual allegations in the complaint set forth a cause of action that the plaintiff's arrest for harassment in the second degree in violation of Penal Law § 240.26(3) was not supported by probable cause and therefore, was not legally justified (see Broughton v. State of New York, 37 N.Y.2d 451, 373 N.Y.S.2d 87, 335 N.E.2d 310, cert. denied 423 U.S. 929, 96 S.Ct. 277, 46 L.Ed.2d 257; see also People v. Valerio, 60 N.Y.2d 669, 468 N.Y.S.2d 100, 455 N.E.2d 659; People v. Otto, 40 N.Y.2d 864, 387 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 356 N.E.2d 481; People v. Chasserot, 30 N.Y.2d 898, 335 N.Y.S.2d 442, 286 N.E.2d 925; Krisanda v. Miller, 205 A.D.2d 1029, 614 N.Y.S.2d 73). Moreover, contrary to the defendants' contention, the factual allegations in the complaint did not establish that the defense of qualified immunity applies (see Colao v. Mills, 3 A.D.3d 702, 770 N.Y.S.2d 474; Kubik v. New York State Dept. of Social Servs., 278 A.D.2d 644, 719 N.Y.S.2d 130).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 07, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)