Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
FREMONT INVESTMENT AND LOAN, plaintiff, v. Earl KINLAW, defendant-respondent, et al., defendants; Omni Ventures, Inc., etc., nonparty-appellant; Andrew W. Lawrence, nonparty-respondent.
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, Omni Ventures, Inc., as assignee of the purchase money second mortgage of the defendants Reginald Spinello and Edward J. Bogan, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mullen, J.), dated April 19, 2004, which, in effect, denied its motion, inter alia, to reject the Referee's report dated March 5, 2004, recommending that the surplus money from the sale of the property be distributed to the defendant Earl Kinlaw and that the fees of Andrew W. Lawrence, the Referee, in the amount of $1,450 be approved, and confirmed the report.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the Referee's report is rejected, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for a hearing to determine the amount of surplus money due to Omni Ventures, Inc., and to direct the Suffolk County Treasurer to distribute the surplus money in accordance herewith.
“Surplus money ․ stands in the place of the land for all purposes of distribution among persons having vested interests or liens upon the land” (Shankman v. Horoshko, 291 A.D.2d 441, 442, 737 N.Y.S.2d 554, quoting Roosevelt Sav. Bank v. Goldberg, 118 Misc.2d 220, 221, 459 N.Y.S.2d 988). Contrary to the Referee's conclusion, Omni Ventures, Inc. (hereinafter Omni), as assignee of the purchase money second mortgage of the defendants Reginald Spinello and Edward J. Bogan, which was duly recorded, was entitled to have the surplus applied towards elimination of its subordinate lien upon a showing of the unpaid amount (see Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law § 1361; Shankman v. Horoshko, supra at 442, 737 N.Y.S.2d 554; Citibank v. Schroeder, 266 A.D.2d 332, 698 N.Y.S.2d 304; Federal Home Loan Mtge. Corp. v. Grant, 224 A.D.2d 656, 639 N.Y.S.2d 72). Since Omni was the sole claimant, any remaining amount, less the administrative charges of the Suffolk County Treasurer and the approved fees of the Referee, reverts to the mortgagor, the defendant Earl Kinlaw.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 07, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)