Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Eddie WAY, Appellant, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (McNamara, J.), entered February 5, 2004 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, dismissed the petition for lack of personal jurisdiction.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination denying him good time allowance. Because petitioner failed to timely serve the Attorney General with a signed order to show cause, Supreme Court dismissed the petition for lack of personal jurisdiction. Petitioner maintains that he complied with the technical requirements of the order because he previously had served the Attorney General with an unsigned order to show cause and then, when realizing his mistake after the date set forth in the order, served an executed order to show cause on the Attorney General. Nevertheless, an unexecuted order to show cause has no legal effect (see People ex rel. Watson v. Walsh, 7 A.D.3d 850, 776 N.Y.S.2d 352 [2004]; Matter of Elufe v. Parrott, 6 A.D.3d 856, 773 N.Y.S.2d 910 [2004]; Matter of Green v. Selsky, 257 A.D.2d 909, 682 N.Y.S.2d 647 [1999]; Matter of Mabry v. Coombe, 251 A.D.2d 801 [1998] ) and petitioner has failed to demonstrate that his incarceration presented an obstacle to the service requirements which prevented him from complying with the directives set forth in the order (see Matter of Green v. Duncan, 10 A.D.3d 743, 781 N.Y.S.2d 712 [2004], lv. denied 4 N.Y.3d 701, 790 N.Y.S.2d 647, 824 N.E.2d 48 [2004] ). Supreme Court's judgment dismissing the petition for lack of personal jurisdiction is, accordingly, affirmed.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 10, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)