Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Luis ROMERO, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Malone Jr., J.), entered June 27, 2005 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent's motion to dismiss the petition.
Petitioner, an inmate, filed a grievance challenging correctional officials' failure to designate a code for his religious denomination. When his grievance was denied, he attempted to commence a CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the denial. In the order to show cause, Supreme Court directed petitioner to serve “the [o]rder to [s]how [c]ause, the petition, exhibits and any supporting affidavits, by ordinary [f]irst [c]lass [m]ail, upon each named respondent and upon the Attorney General ․ on or before April 15, 2005.” When petitioner failed to effectuate timely service on the Attorney General or serve the papers upon respondent, respondent moved to dismiss the petition for lack of personal jurisdiction. Supreme Court granted the motion and dismissed the petition, resulting in this appeal.
Although petitioner's affidavit of service indicates that he mailed the papers to respondent and the Attorney General on April 12, 2005, the envelope received by the Attorney General's office indicates that it was not postmarked until April 18, 2005 and the affidavit provided by a secretary in the office of respondent's counsel discloses that no papers were ever received by respondent. In view of this, and since petitioner has not demonstrated that obstacles related to his imprisonment prevented him from complying with the terms of the order to show cause, Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition (see Matter of Barclay v. State of New York Dept. of Correctional Servs., 22 A.D.3d 974, 974, 802 N.Y.S.2d 389 [2005]; Matter of Frederick v. Goord, 20 A.D.3d 652, 653, 798 N.Y.S.2d 210 [2005], lv. denied 5 N.Y.3d 712, 806 N.Y.S.2d 163, 840 N.E.2d 132 [2005] ).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 15, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)