Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: CARRO'S LIMOUSINE SERVICE, INC., Petitioner, v. TOWN OF OYSTER BAY, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Town Board of Oyster Bay, dated August 6, 1996, which, after a hearing, affirmed the decision of the Town Clerk of the Town of Oyster Bay, denying the petitioner's application for renewal of its license to operate a limousine service for the years 1995 through 1997.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
It is well settled that estoppel may not be invoked against a municipality to prevent it from discharging its statutory duties or for the purpose of preventing the municipality from rectifying an administrative error (see, Matter of Parkview Assocs. v. City of New York, 71 N.Y.2d 274, 282, 525 N.Y.S.2d 176, 519 N.E.2d 1372, cert. denied 488 U.S. 801, 109 S.Ct. 30, 102 L.Ed.2d 9; see also, McGannon v. Bd. of Trustees for Village of Pomona, 239 A.D.2d 392, 657 N.Y.S.2d 745; Baris Shoe Co. v. Town of Oyster Bay, 234 A.D.2d 245, 246, 650 N.Y.S.2d 776).
The petitioner was granted a limousine license from 1983 through February 1993, and operated its business from a residence for 10 years in reliance upon this license. It is undisputed that the petitioner's prior licenses were issued in error and that the operation of a limousine business in a residential zone violates the zoning laws of the Town of Oyster Bay (see, Town of Oyster Bay Zoning Code § 246-135, et seq.). In light of these facts, the Town of Oyster Bay (hereinafter the Town) cannot be estopped from enforcing its zoning laws by denying the petitioner's application for renewal of his license to operate a limousine business from this residential location (see, Matter of Parkview Assocs. v. City of New York, supra, at 282, 525 N.Y.S.2d 176, 519 N.E.2d 1372).
The Town's denial of the petitioner's license to operate a limousine business was neither arbitrary nor capricious and was based on substantial evidence.
The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 30, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)