Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Caridad BLAIN, Respondent, v. EMSIG MANUFACTURING CORPORATION et al., Appellants. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed November 27, 1995, which ruled that claimant had given timely notice of injury and awarded workers' compensation benefits.
On March 29, 1993, claimant fell on her back and neck on a snow covered sidewalk in front of her employer's premises as she arrived at work. Despite some pain, claimant did not seek medical attention and continued to work until June 2, 1993, when severe back pain rendered her unable to stand or to engage in work. At that time, claimant submitted a written request for disability benefits which informed the employer, for the first time, that she had sustained a work-related injury. Claimant thereafter submitted a written notice of her injury and claim for workers' compensation benefits to the employer on August 31, 1993, well beyond the 30-day notification period set forth in Workers' Compensation Law § 18. Substantial evidence supports the Workers' Compensation Board's decision which excused claimant's failure to file a timely notice on the ground that she had notified her employer as soon as she realized the severity of her injury (see, Matter of Peters v. Putnam Hosp. Ctr., 146 A.D.2d 834, 835, 536 N.Y.S.2d 239; Matter of McEnaney v. Memorial Hosp., 80 A.D.2d 689, 436 N.Y.S.2d 440, lv. denied 53 N.Y.2d 606, 440 N.Y.S.2d 1026, 422 N.E.2d 835). Contrary to the contention raised on appeal, the Board's decision to excuse claimant's late notice was not dependent upon the possibility of prejudice to the employer (see, Matter of Voight v. Rochester Prods. Div., GMC, 125 A.D.2d 799, 801, 509 N.Y.S.2d 908). Inasmuch as the Board's decision is supported by the record, it will not be disturbed (see, id.).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 02, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)