Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Warren WILDER, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF PAROLE et al., Respondents.
Appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court (Teresi, J.), entered June 30, 1997 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondents' motion to dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, challenges Supreme Court's dismissal of his petition for lack of personal jurisdiction over respondents. Supreme Court dismissed the petition because petitioner failed to comply with a March 18, 1997 order to show cause which relaxed the service requirements and directed petitioner to serve respondents and the Attorney-General by ordinary first-class mail and file proof of service before a specific date. “Failure of an inmate to satisfy the service requirements set forth in an order to show cause requires dismissal for lack of jurisdiction absent a showing that imprisonment presented obstacles beyond his control which prevented compliance * * * ” (Matter of Gittens v. Selsky, 193 A.D.2d 986, 987, 598 N.Y.S.2d 110 [citations omitted] ). Although petitioner claimed that he had delivered the necessary documents to the law library officer for mailing, the disbursement request form submitted by petitioner in support of this contention indicates that he only requested that the documents be sent to the Attorney-General. Furthermore, notwithstanding petitioner's submission of an affidavit of service, respondents deny having been served with the order to show cause, the petition and supporting papers. Inasmuch as petitioner failed to comply with the order to show cause, we conclude that the petition was properly dismissed (see, Matter of Marsalona v. Coombe, 234 A.D.2d 841, 651 N.Y.S.2d 941; Matter of McRae v. New York State Div. of Parole, 221 A.D.2d 827, 828, 633 N.Y.S.2d 677; Matter of Gittens v. Selsky, supra ).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 02, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)