Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Shirlee BRAUNSTEIN, et al., Appellants, v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, et al., Defendants, Town of Hempstead, Respondent.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Joseph, J.), entered February 15, 2001, which, upon the granting of the motion of the defendant Town of Hempstead pursuant to CPLR 4401 to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it at the close of the plaintiffs' evidence, dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted against it.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the defendant Town of Hempstead (hereinafter the Town) pursuant to CPLR 4401 to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it. There is no rational process by which the factfinder could base a finding in favor of the plaintiffs (see Szczerbiak v. Pilat, 90 N.Y.2d 553, 664 N.Y.S.2d 252, 686 N.E.2d 1346). The plaintiffs failed to establish that the Town had prior written notice of the defective condition, or that the Town created the condition by an affirmative act of negligence or that its use of the property constituted a special use for the benefit of the Town (see Benincasa v. Village of Irvington, 290 A.D.2d 406, 737 N.Y.S.2d 295; ITT Hartford Ins. Co. v. Village of Ossining, 257 A.D.2d 606, 684 N.Y.S.2d 258). The catch basin in question did not fall within the special use exception to the prior written notice requirement as its drainage function provided proper maintenance of a safe roadway and served no municipal function inuring to the special benefit of the Town (see Vise v. County of Suffolk, 207 A.D.2d 341, 615 N.Y.S.2d 429; Barnes v. City of Mount Vernon, 245 A.D.2d 407, 666 N.Y.S.2d 206).
Contrary to the plaintiffs' remaining contention, “constructive notice of a defect may not override the statutory requirement of prior written notice to the municipality” (Henrickson v. City of New York, 285 A.D.2d 529, 727 N.Y.S.2d 659; see Amabile v. City of Buffalo, 93 N.Y.2d 471, 693 N.Y.S.2d 77, 715 N.E.2d 104).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 06, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)