Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Patrick KELLY, Appellant, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Zwack, J.), entered December 21, 2007 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged in a misbehavior report with providing unauthorized legal assistance, disobeying a direct order and possessing property in an unauthorized area. Petitioner pleaded guilty with an explanation to providing unauthorized legal assistance and was found guilty following a tier III disciplinary hearing of disobeying a direct order. He was found not guilty of possessing property in an unauthorized area. The determination was administratively affirmed and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued. Supreme Court dismissed the petition, prompting this appeal.
We affirm. Regarding petitioner's claim that he was denied adequate employee assistance, he has failed to demonstrate, nor does the record reveal, any prejudice suffered by him as a result of any alleged deficiencies (see Matter of Abdullah v. Goord, 36 A.D.3d 978, 979, 826 N.Y.S.2d 505 [2007] ). As for petitioner's assertion that he was denied the right to present witness testimony, he expressly advised the Hearing Officer that he did not want to call any witnesses (see Matter of Griffin v. Goord, 43 A.D.3d 591, 592, 840 N.Y.S.2d 498 [2007] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and, to the extent that they are properly before this Court, are unavailing.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 18, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)