Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: John PEANA, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
While on the draft bus, petitioner complained to a correction officer that two other inmates had assaulted him and broken his glasses. He then ignored the officer's directive to come to the front of the bus. When the officer approached petitioner, petitioner began yelling and kicked the officer in the leg. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with assaulting staff, refusing a direct order and creating a disturbance. He was found guilty of the charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing. After the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal with a modified penalty, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, documentary evidence and testimony adduced at the hearing provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Credle v. Selsky, 46 A.D.3d 989, 990, 846 N.Y.S.2d 797 [2007]; Matter of Abdul-Khaliq v. Goord, 34 A.D.3d 872, 822 N.Y.S.2d 742 [2006] ). The contrary testimony of petitioner and his inmate witness presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Russell v. Selsky, 50 A.D.3d 1412, 1412-1413, 857 N.Y.S.2d 289 [2008]; Matter of Parkinson v. Selsky, 49 A.D.3d 985, 985, 853 N.Y.S.2d 412 [2008] ). Accordingly, we find no reason to disturb respondent's determination.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 18, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)