Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: JUANITA F. (Anonymous). Catholic Guardian Society, et al., Respondents, Ciselis F. (Anonymous), Appellant (Proceeding No. 1). In the Matter of Viviana F. (Anonymous). Catholic Guardian Society, et al., Respondents, Ciselis F. (Anonymous), Appellant (Proceeding No. 2).
In two related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384–b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of two dispositional orders of the Family Court, Queens County (DePhillips, J.), both entered April 20, 2001 (one in each proceeding), as, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, terminated her parental rights with respect to the children, and transferred custody and guardianship rights of the children to the Commissioner of Social Services and Catholic Guardian Society for purposes of adoption.
ORDERED that the orders are affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing supports the finding of permanent neglect of each child. The agency established by clear and convincing evidence that it made diligent attempts to strengthen the parent-child relationship, and that, despite its encouragement, the mother failed to maintain continuous contact with her children, who are now 15 and 8 years old, on a regular basis and failed to plan for their future (see, Social Services Law § 384–b; Matter of [Emmanuel] B., 267 A.D.2d 114, 700 N.Y.S.2d 145). Further, during the relevant time period, the mother failed to avail herself of the drug treatment necessary to enable her to regain custody of her children (see, Matter of [Jordan] D., 271 A.D.2d 350, 707 N.Y.S.2d 84).
In addition, the evidence adduced at the dispositional hearing demonstrated that the children's best interests would be served by terminating the mother's parental rights and freeing them for adoption by their foster parents, with whom they had bonded and expressed their desire to remain (see, Matter of [Sheila] G., 61 N.Y.2d 368, 474 N.Y.S.2d 421, 462 N.E.2d 1139; Matter of [Tiwana] M., 267 A.D.2d 144, 700 N.Y.S.2d 175; Matter of [Brandon] W., 262 A.D.2d 644, 693 N.Y.S.2d 608; Matter of [Maldrina] R, 219 A.D.2d 723, 631 N.Y.S.2d 742; Matter of [Desire Star] H., 202 A.D.2d 582, 609 N.Y.S.2d 268).
The mother's remaining contention is without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 19, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)