Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Wayne ROWE, Petitioner, v. Glenn GOORD, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules prohibiting assault on staff, refusing a direct order and possession of a weapon. At the outset, we note that the Attorney-General concedes, and our review of the record confirms, that there is insufficient evidence to support that part of the determination finding petitioner guilty of assault on staff. This charge must be annulled and expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the matter remitted to respondent for a redetermination of the penalty imposed (see, Matter of Dickerson v. Goord, 254 A.D.2d 645, 679 N.Y.S.2d 725; Matter of Vargas v. Goord, 253 A.D.2d 947, 678 N.Y.S.2d 916).
Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his assertion that the hearing was untimely held, have been examined and found to be unpersuasive. Contrary to petitioner's argument, the entire determination need not be annulled because of a minor and nonprejudicial 20-minute discrepancy between the times listed on the unusual incident and the misbehavior report which the author of the misbehavior report testified was a clerical error on his part (see, Matter of Alvarado v. Goord, 252 A.D.2d 650, 675 N.Y.S.2d 220).
ADJUDGED that the determination is modified, without costs, by annulling so much thereof as found petitioner guilty of the charge of assault on staff; petition granted to that extent, respondent is directed to expunge all references thereto from petitioner's institutional record and matter remitted to respondent for redetermination of the penalty imposed on the remaining violations; and, as so modified, confirmed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 28, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)