Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Romel FERRER, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.), rendered February 21, 1997, convicting him of criminal facilitation in the second degree and hindering prosecution in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 467 N.Y.S.2d 349, 454 N.E.2d 932), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt of criminal facilitation in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt. The evidence showed that an individual named Chris attempted to hire the defendant to commit murder. The defendant refused, but agreed to permit Chris to meet the victim in a building of which the defendant was the caretaker. The defendant admitted that Chris showed him a gun and stated that a single shot should do it. Chris also requested, and the defendant agreed, to have all of the other tenants leave the building while Chris met the victim in the building. Thus, based on all of the evidence, it can be reasonably inferred that the defendant believed Chris was about to kill someone, and that the defendant purposefully rendered aid to Chris by providing him with a secluded place, which in fact aided Chris in the commission of the crime.
Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15[5] ).
The sentence imposed was not excessive.
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 01, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)