Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Donald J. COOK, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Nicandri, J.), rendered September 23, 1996, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of two counts of the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree.
Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to two counts of the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree in full satisfaction of a 22-count indictment. In exchange, defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender to consecutive prison terms of 1 to 3 years and 11/313 to 4 years. Defendant contends on this appeal that the judgment of conviction must be reversed because his guilty plea was neither knowing nor voluntary. Defendant's claim is, however, belied by the record which shows that prior to accepting defendant's plea, County Court engaged in an extended colloquy with defendant, eliciting statements that he understood the terms of the plea agreement and that he had discussed the ramifications thereof with defense counsel, who was present at the time (see, People v. Hicks, 201 A.D.2d 831, 608 N.Y.S.2d 543, lv. denied 83 N.Y.2d 911, 614 N.Y.S.2d 393, 637 N.E.2d 284; People v. Kulzer, 199 A.D.2d 783, 784, 605 N.Y.S.2d 505).
We further reject defendant's contention that his consecutive prison sentences were harsh and excessive. In view of defendant's lengthy criminal history, the heinous nature of the crime involving sexual misconduct over a period of five years with an underaged victim, and the fact that the sentence was the agreed-upon result of a negotiated plea agreement pursuant to which 20 other criminal charges against defendant were dropped, we conclude that the sentence imposed by County Court was neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v. Appollonia, 247 A.D.2d 770, 668 N.Y.S.2d 515, lv. denied 92 N.Y.2d 847, 677 N.Y.S.2d 77, 699 N.E.2d 437; People v. Rousseau, 245 A.D.2d 915, 666 N.Y.S.2d 57). We, accordingly, decline to disturb it.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
PETERS, J.
MIKOLL, J.P., CREW III, YESAWICH, JR., and GRAFFEO, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 11, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)