Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
CITIBANK, N.A., respondent, v. Michael ROSEN, etc., appellant.
In an action on a guarantee, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), dated March 26, 1998, as denied his motion to dismiss the complaint as time-barred pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) and CPLR 213(2).
ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.
In mid-1989, when the defendant, Michael Rosen, was a principal of a corporation known as Progressive Personnel, Inc. (hereinafter Progressive), the plaintiff, Citibank, N.A. (hereinafter Citibank), provided Progressive with a $40,000 line of credit, secured, inter alia, by Rosen's personal guarantee. As a result of internal struggles within the business, Rosen ceased to be president of Progressive on October 5, 1990, and was removed as an officer and director of the corporation on June 3, 1991. Rosen promptly notified Citibank of these developments. According to the Line of Credit Agreement between Progressive and Citibank dated August 16, 1989, Progressive “will be in default” of its Line of Credit Agreement, inter alia, “[i]f any Guarantor of this obligation * * * shall cease to be an officer, director or partner in the Borrower's business” (emphasis supplied). Since the foregoing events occurred on or before June 3, 1991, and Citibank's cause of action against Progressive and/or Rosen accrued on or before that date, Citibank had six years, that is, until June 3, 1997, to commence an action to satisfy any outstanding debt under the parties' agreement (see, CPLR 213[2]; 203[a]; General Phoenix Corp. v. Cabot, 300 N.Y. 87, 92, 89 N.E.2d 238; North Fork Bank v. Healy, 224 A.D.2d 601, 638 N.Y.S.2d 671; Marine Midland Bank v. Walter Perlstein, Inc., 175 A.D.2d 523, 524, 572 N.Y.S.2d 789; Bayside Fuel Oil Depot Corp. v. Savino Oil & Heating Co., 133 A.D.2d 658, 660, 519 N.Y.S.2d 832; Gazza v. United California Bank Intl., 88 A.D.2d 968, 969, 451 N.Y.S.2d 806). The instant lawsuit to recover $48,219.92 in loans on which Progressive had defaulted, commenced by Citibank against Rosen alone in September 1997, was therefore time-barred (see, e.g., Kandilaris v. Lindover, 251 A.D.2d 76, 674 N.Y.S.2d 295).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 22, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)