Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Carmine S. VITALE, appellant, v. Daniel L. CARSON, et al., respondents.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), dated January 26, 1998, which granted the respective motions of the defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that he failed to sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d).
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the defendants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
The defendants separately moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, on the ground that the plaintiff failed to sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d), and that the plaintiff's medical records established that his complaints were pre-existing. In opposition to the defendants' motion papers, which established prima facie that they were entitled to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiff submitted no medical evidence to support his allegation that an exacerbation and/or acceleration of his pre-existing injuries was causally related to the subject accident (see, Nadrich v. Woodcrest Country Club, 250 A.D.2d 827, 671 N.Y.S.2d 1017; Zuckerman v. Karagjozi, 247 A.D.2d 536, 669 N.Y.S.2d 295; Weaver v. Derr, 242 A.D.2d 823, 661 N.Y.S.2d 684; Antoniou v. Duff, 204 A.D.2d 670, 612 N.Y.S.2d 430). Accordingly, summary judgment was properly granted to the defendants dismissing the complaint.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 22, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)