Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Frank HOLOCEK, respondent-appellant, v. RICH NOWAK CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., et al., respondents, John Lynn, appellant-respondent.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant John Lynn appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated July 28, 1997, as denied his cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against him, and the plaintiff cross-appeals from so much of the same order as denied his motion, inter alia, for summary judgment on the issue of liability against the defendant Rich Nowak Construction Co., Inc.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from; and it is further,
ORDERED that the defendant Rich Nowak Construction Co., Inc., is awarded one bill of costs.
The plaintiff, Frank Holocek, allegedly sustained personal injuries when a wooden plank fell from an upper story at a construction site and struck him in the head. The defendant John Lynn moved for summary judgment, contending that as the owner of the single-family home under construction, he may not be held liable for the plaintiff's injuries pursuant to Labor Law § 240(1). However, the Supreme Court correctly denied the motion, as there were issues of fact as to whether Lynn, who allegedly served as his own general contractor, exercised direction and control over the work being performed. Furthermore, the court was also correct to deny the plaintiff's motion, inter alia, for summary judgment on the issue of liability as against the defendant Rich Nowak Construction Co., Inc. (hereinafter Nowak), as issues of fact exist as to whether Nowak acted in the capacity of a general contractor or as a subcontractor to Lynn.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 01, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)