Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Dixon S. WELT, an Attorney and Counselor-at-Law. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Dixon S. Welt, Respondent.
Respondent was admitted to practice by this court in 1962 and maintains an office for the practice of law in Albany.
Respondent admits to professional misconduct as charged and specified in five charges of a petition filed by petitioner Committee on Professional Standards. According to the charges, respondent neglected a personal injury action he had commenced on behalf of a client leading to its dismissal with prejudice. After the dismissal, respondent repeatedly and falsely advised the client the matter was still pending. After the client discharged him, respondent failed to forward the file to the client's new lawyers. Respondent also attempted to mislead petitioner concerning his handling of the matter and failed to accord petitioner the full and prompt cooperation it is due.
We grant respondent's motion to dismiss charge V because we decline to expansively read the disciplinary rule prohibiting a lawyer from neglecting a legal matter entrusted to the lawyer (22 NYCRR 1200.30[a][3] ) to encompass neglect of duties as co-trustee of a law firm profit-sharing plan as alleged in specification 1. Specification 2 of the charge, alleging failure to pay a judgment, has been rendered moot by respondent's payment of it.
Under the circumstances presented, including respondent's prior unblemished disciplinary record, we conclude that respondent should be censured for his professional misconduct.
ORDERED that respondent is found guilty of charges I through IV and VI, as charged and specified in the petition; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent's cross motion to dismiss charge V is granted; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent is censured.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 10, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)