Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Adrian McCAIN, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
After a correction officer noticed a group of inmates acting suspiciously, a nearby area was searched and a rock in a sock was found on the floor, prompting an investigation. During the investigation, an inmate was found who had a head injury consistent with being struck with such a weapon. A confidential source implicated petitioner as the perpetrator of the attack and he was charged in a misbehavior report with assault, fighting and possessing a weapon. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
The determination must be confirmed. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the sergeant who prepared it as well as that of the confidential informant, constitute substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Berry v. Goord, 13 A.D.3d 947, 787 N.Y.S.2d 439 [2004]; Matter of Ferguson v. Goord, 13 A.D.3d 949, 949, 787 N.Y.S.2d 442 [2004] ). The Hearing Officer conducted a personal interview to independently assess the informant's reliability (see Matter of Thomassini v. Goord, 13 A.D.3d 954, 787 N.Y.S.2d 443 [2004]; Matter of Pabon v. Goord, 6 A.D.3d 833, 834, 773 N.Y.S.2d 916 [2004] ). The testimony of petitioner's inmate witnesses that they did not observe petitioner strike the victim presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Mannings v. Selsky, 296 A.D.2d 751, 744 N.Y.S.2d 913 [2002]; Matter of Miller v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 295 A.D.2d 714, 714-715, 743 N.Y.S.2d 632 [2002] ). We have considered petitioner's due process claim and find it to be unavailing.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 23, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)