Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Edward BREEDEN, Appellant, v. John J. DONNELLI, as Superintendent of Bare Hill Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered March 24, 2005 in Franklin County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner's request for parole release.
Petitioner is currently serving a prison sentence of 12 1/212 to 25 years in connection with his sexual assault of a 13-year-old female. Although petitioner's conditional release date was February 7, 2004, he was not released at that time and remains incarcerated due to his failure to fulfill the requirement of the Board of Parole that he secure a suitable residence. Petitioner commenced this proceeding, challenging the denial. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and this appeal ensued.
We affirm. The Board is authorized to impose special conditions which must be satisfied prior to an inmate's release from prison (see Executive Law § 259-c[2]; § 259-g; Matter of Wright v. Travis, 297 A.D.2d 842, 842, 746 N.Y.S.2d 850 [2002]; see also People ex rel. Bernzott v. Murray, 12 A.D.3d 1102, 1102, 784 N.Y.S.2d 402 [2004]; Matter of Monroe v. Travis, 280 A.D.2d 675, 676, 721 N.Y.S.2d 377 [2001], lv. denied 96 N.Y.2d 714, 729 N.Y.S.2d 441, 754 N.E.2d 201 [2001] ). Where, as here, the inmate has a history of criminal behavior, including multiple serious sex offenses, and has demonstrated an inability to comply with the terms of parole release, a condition requiring that he secure an approved residence prior to his release is rational (see Matter of Billups v. New York State Div. of Parole, 18 A.D.3d 1085, 1085-1086, 795 N.Y.S.2d 408 [2005]; Matter of Wright v. Travis, supra at 842, 746 N.Y.S.2d 850). Moreover, the Board has no obligation to assist him in locating and securing appropriate housing (see Executive Law § 259-a[6]-[8]; 9 NYCRR 8000.1[a][5] ).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
MUGGLIN, J.
CREW III, J.P., PETERS, ROSE and KANE, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 16, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)