Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Nino ROMANO, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 25, 2005, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruling that claimant voluntarily left his employment as a social worker at a residential substance abuse treatment facility for personal and noncompelling reasons. The record establishes that claimant, despite accommodations made by the employer, could not keep up with his work load inasmuch as he was unable to adjust to the recordkeeping changes implemented by the employer two years earlier. Due to his poor work performance, claimant received two warnings and a poor performance evaluation. The resignation tendered by claimant indicated that he “could no longer keep pace with the workload” and was leaving “for personal and professional reasons.” It is well settled that “dissatisfaction with one's employment, including assertions of being overworked, does not constitute good cause for leaving employment” (Matter of Maine [Commissioner of Labor], 282 A.D.2d 854, 855, 723 N.Y.S.2d 541 [2001]; see Matter of Rainville [Univera Healthcare CNY-Commissioner of Labor], 288 A.D.2d 747, 732 N.Y.S.2d 491 [2001] ). Although claimant testified that he had been receiving medical care for emotional and physical ailments engendered by work-related stress and submitted letters from his doctors to that effect, these letters were written after claimant had resigned and, while they supported claimant's decision to quit, they did not indicate that it was medically necessary to do so. Furthermore, claimant failed to inform the employer that the stress from his job was having an adverse effect on his health. Under these circumstances, we find no basis to disturb the Board's decision (see Matter of Dangler [Commissioner of Labor], 306 A.D.2d 790, 790-791, 761 N.Y.S.2d 540 [2003]; Matter of Rainville [Univera Healthcare CNY-Commissioner of Labor], supra ).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 29, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)