Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jacob HOFFMAN, respondent, v. UNIONMUTUAL STOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, et al., defendants, First Unum Life Insurance Company, appellant.
In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant First Unum Life Insurance Company appeals from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), entered February 16, 2007, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it as time-barred, and, upon granting that branch of its motion which was to dismiss the second and third causes of action insofar as asserted against it premised on its alleged bad faith handling of the plaintiff's claim for benefits under a policy of disability insurance, granted the plaintiff leave to serve an amended complaint incorporating the allegations of bad faith into the first cause of action, premised on breach of contract and (2) so much of an order of the same court dated July 9, 2007, as denied that branch of its motion which was to strike portions of the amended complaint.
ORDERED that the orders are affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
In support of that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as time-barred, the appellant failed to make a prima facie showing that it denied the plaintiff's claim for disability benefits under the insurance policy more than six years prior to the commencement of the action (see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324, 508 N.Y.S.2d 923, 501 N.E.2d 572; Annunziato v. City of New York, 33 A.D.3d 950, 824 N.Y.S.2d 115; American Bldg. Contrs. Assoc., Inc. v. Mica & Wood Creations, LLC, 23 A.D.3d 322, 804 N.Y.S.2d 109).
Contrary to the appellant's assertion, the Supreme Court was correct in allowing the allegations of bad faith to be incorporated in an amended complaint and in denying that branch of the appellant's motion which to strike those portions of the amended complaint (see Bi-Economy Mkt., Inc. v. Harleysville Ins. Co. of New York, 10 N.Y.3d 187, 856 N.Y.S.2d 505, 886 N.E.2d 127; Panasia Estates v. Hudson Ins. Co., 10 N.Y.3d 200, 856 N.Y.S.2d 513, 886 N.E.2d 135).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: May 06, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)