Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Anthony S. SADOWSKI, Jr., deceased. Joseph A.F. Sadowski, appellant; Josephine Buonocore, et al., respondents.
In a proceeding to obtain letters of administration, the petitioner appeals from a decree of the Surrogate's Court, Nassau County (Riordan, S.), dated September 22, 2003, which, inter alia, issued letters of administration to the Public Administrator of Nassau County.
ORDERED that the decree is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The decedent, Anthony S. Sadowski, Jr., died intestate and was survived by the petitioner, who was his son, and the petitioner's three siblings, who are the objectants herein. The petitioner sought appointment as the administrator of the decedent's estate. The objectants opposed the petition and requested that letters of administration issue to the Public Administrator of Nassau County (hereinafter the Public Administrator). After a hearing, the Surrogate's Court, inter alia, denied the petition and issued letters of administration to the Public Administrator. We affirm.
On this record, it is apparent that the friction between the petitioner and the objectants would interfere with the proper and efficient administration of the estate, and that future cooperation is unlikely (see Matter of Thompson, 232 A.D.2d 219, 647 N.Y.S.2d 950). Thus, the Surrogate's Court providently exercised its discretion in refusing to issue letters of administration to the petitioner (see Matter of Boyle, 224 A.D.2d 374, 375-376, 638 N.Y.S.2d 75) and, with the consent of the objectants, in issuing letters of administration to the Public Administrator (see Matter of McCarthy's Will, 49 A.D.2d 204, 374 N.Y.S.2d 203).
The petitioner's remaining contentions are either without merit, unpreserved for appellate review, or based on matter dehors the record.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 19, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)