Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: JACLYN L.F. (Anonymous), et al. Gregory S. (Anonymous), et al., appellants; Legal Aid Society, Suffolk County, respondent.
In three consolidated adoption proceedings pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 114, in which the petitioners seek to adopt Jaclyn L. F., Christina F., and Danni G., who have resided in the petitioners' home since their births, the petitioners appeal from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J.), entered July 7, 1998, which denied the petitions and dismissed the proceedings.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioners obviously love and care for the subject children. Nevertheless, the Family Court properly exercised its discretion and considered the best interests of the children in evaluating the factors in favor of and against the children's adoption (see, Domestic Relations Law § 114; Matter of Michael B., 80 N.Y.2d 299, 313-314, 590 N.Y.S.2d 60, 604 N.E.2d 122; Matter of Michael JJ, 200 A.D.2d 80, 82, 613 N.Y.S.2d 715; Matter of Donald U., 105 A.D.2d 875, 482 N.Y.S.2d 74). While perfection is not demanded of adoptive parents (see, Matter of George L. v. Commissioner of Fulton County Dept. of Social Servs., 194 A.D.2d 955, 599 N.Y.S.2d 319), the recent history of drug use by Gregory S., the proposed adoptive father, cannot be minimized and the record does not support his claim of recovery (cf., Matter of Michael JJ, 200 A.D.2d 80, 82, 613 N.Y.S.2d 715). Although his court-ordered drug tests were negative, his prior drug use and convictions were not sufficiently remote in time to adequately assure that the best interests of the children were protected (see, Domestic Relations Law § 114 [1] ).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 25, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)