Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
WHITE HOUSE MANOR, LTD., plaintiff, v. Rose Ellen BENJAMIN, et al., respondents; Korean Presbyterian Church, nonparty-appellant.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for unjust enrichment, nonparty Korean Presbyterian Church appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), entered March 15, 2006, as, upon an order of the same court entered February 7, 2006, inter alia, granting the cross motion the defendants Rose Ellen Benjamin, Joan C. Levy, and Jerald Jay Levy, among other things, in effect, for summary judgment declaring that it breached a contract for the sale of real property dated August 6, 1999, as amended May 4, 2003, and a stipulation of settlement dated June 4, 2003, is in favor of the defendants Rose Ellen Benjamin, Joan C. Levy, and Jerald Jay Levy, and against it declaring that it breached the contract for the sale of real property dated August 6, 1999, as amended May 1, 2003, and the stipulation of settlement dated June 4, 2003.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.
A defect in personal jurisdiction may be waived where a party submits to the court's jurisdiction by stipulating to settle an action (see Matter of Parkside Ltd. Liab. Co., 294 A.D.2d 582, 583, 742 N.Y.S.2d 580; Lomando v. Duncan, 257 A.D.2d 649, 650, 684 N.Y.S.2d 569; Matter of Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Porcelli, 121 A.D.2d 384, 385, 503 N.Y.S.2d 404; Biener v. Hystron Fibers, 78 A.D.2d 162, 167, 434 N.Y.S.2d 343). Where a settlement agreement does not unequivocally terminate the action, the court retains further jurisdiction to supervise and enforce the terms of the agreement (see Teitelbaum Holdings v. Gold, 48 N.Y.2d 51, 53, 421 N.Y.S.2d 556, 396 N.E.2d 1029; Markovits v. Mitrany, 12 A.D.3d 574, 784 N.Y.S.2d 392). Here, contrary to the appellant's contention, the Supreme Court properly exercised its jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the subject stipulation of settlement to which the appellant was a signatory. The appellant's status as a nonparty contract vendee did not require the parties to seek enforcement of the settlement by plenary action (see Berrian v. McCombs, 280 A.D.2d 442, 720 N.Y.S.2d 513).
The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 10, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)