Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Peter PISTONE, Appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Kowtna, J.), rendered July 21, 1999, convicting him of arson in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant's omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence, identification testimony, and his statement to law enforcement authorities.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the hearing court properly denied that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence seized upon his arrest. The arresting officer's observation of a white Dodge van emerging from the driveway of a burning animal kennel after business hours provided the requisite reasonable suspicion of criminal activity necessary to justify the initial stop of the van, in which the defendant was a passenger (see, People v. Sobotker, 43 N.Y.2d 559, 563, 402 N.Y.S.2d 993, 373 N.E.2d 1218; People v. Taylor, 276 A.D.2d 504, 714 N.Y.S.2d 105; People v. Leon, 264 A.D.2d 784, 695 N.Y.S.2d 124). The subsequent statements and actions of the van's driver, the fact that the driver and one of the passengers emitted a strong odor of gasoline, and a gasoline odor inside the van, provided the officer with probable cause for his arrest of the occupants of the van (see, People v. Bigelow, 66 N.Y.2d 417, 423, 497 N.Y.S.2d 630, 488 N.E.2d 451).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 11, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)