Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Marat KRIVOI, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing/Inmate Disciplinary Program, New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was charged with violating prison disciplinary rules prohibiting fighting, assaulting another inmate, engaging in violent conduct and possessing a weapon. Having pleaded guilty to fighting, engaging in violent conduct and possessing a weapon, the only issue before us is whether substantial evidence supports the Hearing Officer's determination finding him guilty of the assault charge. The misbehavior report, which incorporated a deposition of the investigating officer, together with medical reports detailing the victim's injuries and petitioner's own testimony, constitute substantial evidence to support this determination (see, Matter of Burgos v. Coughlin, 108 A.D.2d 194, 488 N.Y.S.2d 847, lv. denied 66 N.Y.2d 603, 498 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 489 N.E.2d 256). We are further unpersuaded by petitioner's assertion that he was improperly denied the right to call a character witness (see, Matter of Oliver v. Kelly, 125 A.D.2d 947, 510 N.Y.S.2d 346, lv. denied 69 N.Y.2d 608, 514 N.Y.S.2d 1026, 507 N.E.2d 322). His remaining arguments, to the extent preserved, have been examined and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
CARPINELLO, J.
CARDONA, P.J., MERCURE, PETERS and SPAIN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 14, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)