Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Alvin GREEN, Appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aiello, J.), rendered June 14, 1995, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant maintains that the jury's rejection of his defense of justification was against the weight of the evidence. This contention is without merit. Resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses (see, People v. Gaimari, 176 N.Y. 84, 96, 68 N.E. 112; People v. Sneed, 233 A.D.2d 410, 650 N.Y.S.2d 571; People v. Lemaire, 187 A.D.2d 532, 533, 589 N.Y.S.2d 919). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see, People v. Sneed, supra; People v. Garafolo, 44 A.D.2d 86, 88, 353 N.Y.S.2d 500). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15[5] ).
There is no merit to the defendant's further contention that the court improperly adjudicated him a second violent felony offender on the ground that the predicate felony was based upon a coerced plea of guilty. It was not coercive for the court to have remarked in the prior case that if the defendant were to be convicted after trial, it would impose a sentence close to the maximum allowable under the law (see, People v. Jones, 232 A.D.2d 505, 648 N.Y.S.2d 331; People v. Cornelio, 227 A.D.2d 248, 642 N.Y.S.2d 648; People v. Stephens, 188 A.D.2d 345, 346, 591 N.Y.S.2d 25).
The defendant's sentence was not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 85-86, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).
The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05[2]; People v. Smith, 222 A.D.2d 535, 635 N.Y.S.2d 538), and, in any event, is without merit.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 09, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)