Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Reginald HANNAH, Petitioner, v. John W. BURGE, as Superintendent of Elmira Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, an inmate, was charged in a misbehavior report with smuggling and violating correspondence regulations after it was discovered that envelopes in outgoing mail listing petitioner's name and identification number in the return address contained letters written by another inmate. Following a tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of both charges. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, hearing testimony and sample of petitioner's handwriting, together with reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, constitute substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Santana v. Selsky, 23 A.D.3d 722, 723, 803 N.Y.S.2d 313 [2005] ). Petitioner's exculpatory statements regarding his role in the matter presented credibility issues for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Lashley v. Goord, 39 A.D.3d 1105, 1106, 832 N.Y.S.2d 829 [2007] ). As for petitioner's assertion that he was denied the right to call certain witnesses, the Hearing Officer properly refused those witnesses who had no personal knowledge of the incident and whose testimony would not have been material (see Matter of Williams v. Goord, 27 A.D.3d 808, 809-810, 809 N.Y.S.2d 688 [2006] ). To the extent preserved, petitioner's remaining claims have been examined and found to be unavailing.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 20, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)