Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Randie WOODS, Petitioner, v. H. Carl McCALL, as State Comptroller, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Comptroller which denied petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits.
Petitioner, a correction officer at Great Meadow Correctional Facility in Washington County, was removing a prison inmate from his cell when the automatic cell gate stuck and did not open. Petitioner sustained a back injury while pulling on the cell gate in an attempt to open it. His subsequent application for accidental disability retirement benefits was denied on the grounds that his back injury was caused by his physical exertion and emanated from a risk inherent in his duties and, therefore, was not caused by an accident within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law § 605. As the record establishes that petitioner made the voluntary decision to pull on the gate in response to the malfunction of the automatic gate release, thereby precipitating his injury, we find that substantial evidence supports the determination that the injury to petitioner's back did not constitute an accident (see, Matter of Caramante v. Regan, 129 A.D.2d 850, 851-852, 513 N.Y.S.2d 881, lv denied 69 N.Y.2d 611, 517 N.Y.S.2d 1026, 511 N.E.2d 85; cf., Matter of Leuenberger v. McCall, 235 A.D.2d 906, 907, 652 N.Y.S.2d 671, 672).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: June 12, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)