Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Jose VASQUEZ, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE PAROLE BOARD, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Berke, J.), entered August 19, 1996 in Washington County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent denying petitioner's application for parole release.
Petitioner is serving a prison term of 15 years to life following his 1978 conviction of the crimes of murder in the second degree, attempted murder in the second degree and absconding from temporary release. Although petitioner challenges the denial of his application for parole release, such decisions are discretionary and will not be disturbed so long as they satisfy the statutory requirements (see, Executive Law § 259-i; see also, Matter of Walker v. New York State Div. of Parole, 203 A.D.2d 757, 610 N.Y.S.2d 397) and there is no showing of either error or “irrationality bordering on impropriety” (Matter of Russo v. New York State Bd. of Parole, 50 N.Y.2d 69, 77, 427 N.Y.S.2d 982, 405 N.E.2d 225). Our review of the record discloses that these requirements were met by respondent's consideration of petitioner's application, with a special emphasis placed upon the fact that petitioner had committed a murder while on furlough from a previous term of incarceration. As a final matter, we are unpersuaded that this court's decision in Matter of Marturano v. Hammock, 87 A.D.2d 732, 449 N.Y.S.2d 327, lv denied 56 N.Y.2d 506, 453 N.Y.S.2d 1025, 438 N.E.2d 880 does not reflect the current state of the law.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 12, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)