Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Dwayne JENKINS, Petitioner, v. Philip COOMBE Jr., as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting unhygienic acts and possession of contraband after five milk cartons containing feces and urine were found in his cell during a routine cell frisk. The detailed misbehavior report written by the correction officer who conducted the cell frisk was sufficiently relevant and probative to support the determination of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966, 563 N.Y.S.2d 728, 565 N.E.2d 477). Although not tested or presented at the hearing, we find that the Hearing Officer could reasonably rely upon the correction officers' identification of the substances contained in the milk cartons through their appearance and odor (see generally, Matter of Cornish v. Coughlin, 122 A.D.2d 495, 496, 505 N.Y.S.2d 255 [correction officer's observations sufficient to sustain determination] ). Petitioner's contention that the substance was food merely created a credibility determination for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Wood v. Selsky, 237 A.D.2d 843, 844, 655 N.Y.S.2d 181, 182). Finally, contrary to petitioner's assertion, we find that sanctions were properly imposed (see, Matter of Coleman v. Kelly, 72 N.Y.2d 850, 851-852, 532 N.Y.S.2d 92, 527 N.E.2d 1228). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be unpersuasive.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 12, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)