Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Kevin SHEILS, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner became disruptive, used profanities and refused to comply with a correction officer's directives while being processed for a visit with his fiancée. He was charged in a misbehavior report with making threats, refusing a direct order, engaging in violent conduct and creating a disturbance, and was found guilty of the charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing. The determination was upheld on administrative appeal, but the penalty was modified. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, the testimony of the correction officers who witnessed the incident, as well as petitioner's own admissions, constitute substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of McFadden v. Armmitage, 1 A.D.3d 670, 670, 766 N.Y.S.2d 617 [2003]; Matter of Saunders v. La Bombard, 257 A.D.2d 840, 840, 685 N.Y.S.2d 119 [1999] ). Contrary to petitioner's claim, the record reveals that the Hearing Officer did consider evidence of petitioner's mental status in making his determination. Petitioner's remaining contentions have either not been preserved for our review, have been abandoned or are lacking in merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: March 17, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)