Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Sylvia Frances CHILLEMI, appellant, v. NATIONAL BIRCHWOOD CORP., et al., respondents.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Henry, J.), dated August 14, 2003, as granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff allegedly was injured when she tripped and fell on a small, concrete step in front of a model home in a condominium complex owned by the defendants. She alleged that a defect existed because the step's edge was chipped, and the shadow cast from the roof line on the step/walkway area created the illusion that the step and walkway were one level.
Although the issue of whether a dangerous or defective condition exists on property is generally one for the trier of fact, some defects are too trivial to be actionable, and thus present no issue of fact (see Trincere v. County of Suffolk, 90 N.Y.2d 976, 665 N.Y.S.2d 615, 688 N.E.2d 489; Riser v. New York City Hous. Auth., 260 A.D.2d 564, 688 N.Y.S.2d 645). Considering all the facts and circumstances of this case, including a review of the photographs of the step/walkway area where the plaintiff fell, the Supreme Court properly concluded that, as a matter of law, the alleged defect, which had no characteristics of a trap or snare, was too trivial to be actionable (see Trincere v. County of Suffolk, supra; Riser v. New York City Hous. Auth., supra ).
The plaintiff's remaining contention is without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 28, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)