PEOPLE v. OSIER (2005)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Benice OSIER, appellant.

Decided: April 18, 2005

BARRY A. COZIER, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, and PETER B. SKELOS, JJ.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Jay L. Weiner of counsel), for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Jodi L. Mandel, and Tziyonah M. Langsam of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Carroll, J.), rendered December 15, 2003, convicting him of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree (two counts) and assault in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly admitted evidence of the defendant's prior convictions of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle to show the defendant's knowledge that his license was suspended (see People v. Alvino, 71 N.Y.2d 233, 242, 525 N.Y.S.2d 7, 519 N.E.2d 808; People v. Molineux, 168 N.Y. 264, 61 N.E. 286).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).

The defendant's remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05[2] ) or without merit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network