Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: RUTH Y. (Anonymous). Orange County Department of Social Services, respondent; Yvonne Y. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 1). In the Matter of Kimberly Y. (Anonymous). Orange County Department of Social Services, respondent; Yvonne Y. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 2).
In two related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Orange County (Kiedaisch, J.), dated March 13, 2003, made after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, which found that she had permanently neglected the subject children, terminated her parental rights, and transferred custody and guardianship of the children to the Orange County Department of Social Services for the purpose of adoption.
ORDERED that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the mother's contention, the evidence presented at the fact-finding hearing established that the Orange County Department of Social Services (hereinafter DSS) made diligent efforts to assist her in planning for the future of her children (see Social Services Law § 384-b). A DSS caseworker, inter alia, repeatedly advised the mother to attend parenting classes and to undergo a mental health evaluation, both of which were court ordered. The caseworker also scheduled visits with the children and repeatedly advised the mother of the ramifications of failing to comply with the court order. While the mother's financial struggles may have provided some explanation for her failure to obtain suitable housing, her financial status had no bearing upon her refusal to undergo a mental health evaluation and to attend parenting classes. Thus, the Family Court's finding that the mother permanently neglected her children was supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Matter of Sheila G., 61 N.Y.2d 368, 384-385, 474 N.Y.S.2d 421, 462 N.E.2d 1139).
Contrary to the mother's contention, the finding that the termination of her parental rights would be in the children's best interests was supported by a preponderance of the evidence in the record (see Family Ct. Act § 631; Matter of Albert E., 259 A.D.2d 315, 686 N.Y.S.2d 421; Matter of Latesha Nicole M., 219 A.D.2d 521, 631 N.Y.S.2d 669).
The mother's remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 28, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)