Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Joseph KIMBLE, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
During a frisk search, a correction officer observed what appeared to be a balloon in petitioner's mouth and ordered him to spit it out. Petitioner refused, seemingly swallowing the object, and punched the officer in the chest. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with smuggling, disobeying a direct order, violating frisk procedures, engaging in violent conduct and assaulting an employee. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal and this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment ensued.
We confirm. Substantial evidence including the misbehavior report and related documentation supports the determination of guilt (see Matter of Tayler v. Selsky, 49 A.D.3d 1060, 1060, 853 N.Y.S.2d 441 [2008] ). Regarding petitioner's remaining procedural contentions, he has waived his right to pursue these claims inasmuch as the record establishes that he voluntarily refused to attend the hearing (see Matter of Tafari v. Selsky, 37 A.D.3d 887, 888, 829 N.Y.S.2d 269 [2007] ).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: November 06, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)