Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. Nicholas LESLIE, Defendant.
The defendant pleaded guilty to Attempted Criminal Sale of a Controlled Substance in the Third Degree. (Penal Law § 110/220.39) The defendant was promised participation in the Interim Probation Supervision program (IPS) and, upon successful completion of IPS, the defendant would be sentenced to five years probation. After interviewing the defendant, IPS informed the court that the defendant could not participate its program because the defendant was not a citizen or legal resident of the United States. The defendant, claims that he was never told that he could be denied IPS if he was not a citizen or legal resident of the United States. The defendant now seeks to withdraw his guilty plea, alleging that had he been aware that his immigration status would have precluded his acceptance by IPS, he would not have pleaded guilty 1 .
Upon a review of the plea minutes, the court acknowledges that the defendant was not advised that if he was not a citizen or legal resident of the United States he would be unable to participate in IPS. As the court held in People v. Jackson, 272 A.D.2d 342, 708 N.Y.S.2d 416 (1st Dep't.2000): “it is well settled that a plea induced by an unfulfilled promise must either be vacated or the promise honored.” Here, as in Jackson, the defendant has not received the benefit of his plea and thus he should be permitted to withdraw his plea.
The motion to allow the defendant to withdraw his plea of guilty is granted.
The foregoing is the decision and order of the court.
FOOTNOTES
1. While the People were given an opportunity to respond to this motion, no response has been filed with the court.
LAURA A. WARD, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: May 01, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, New York County, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)