Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Wilfredo LEBRON, Appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Carroll, J.) rendered January 19, 2000, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defense counsel's representation to the court, made after conferring with the defendant, that the defendant waived his rights pursuant to People v. Antommarchi, 80 N.Y.2d 247, 590 N.Y.S.2d 33, 604 N.E.2d 95, was a valid waiver of those rights (see CPL 260.20; People v. Womack, 292 A.D.2d 402, 738 N.Y.S.2d 595; People v. Smallwood, 225 A.D.2d 713, 639 N.Y.S.2d 938). The fact that the defendant expressed a choice through trial counsel does not render the waiver invalid (see People v. Underwood, 201 A.D.2d 597, 598, 607 N.Y.S.2d 955).
We find no merit in the defendant's claim that the court improperly rejected his race-neutral explanation for the peremptory strike of a prospective juror. A peremptory challenge may be based on the prospective juror's identification as the victim of a crime or closeness to a crime victim (see People v. Richie, 217 A.D.2d 84, 89, 635 N.Y.S.2d 263; People v. Dixon, 202 A.D.2d 12, 17-18, 615 N.Y.S.2d 904). Here, however, the defendant's challenge was based on the mistaken belief that one or more of the children of the prospective juror were crime victims, when in fact, there was no indiction that her children's deaths were anything but accidents. Thus, the court properly concluded that the peremptory strike of that juror was based on her race (see People v. Jupiter, 210 A.D.2d 431, 432-433, 620 N.Y.S.2d 426).
The defendant's claim that the sentence enhancement provisions for persistent felony offenders set forth in Penal Law § 70.08 and CPL 400.16 violate the State and Federal constitutions is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit (see People v. Rosen, 96 N.Y.2d 329, 728 N.Y.S.2d 407, 752 N.E.2d 844, cert. denied 534 U.S. 899, 122 S.Ct. 224, 151 L.Ed.2d 160; People v. Rice, 285 A.D.2d 617, 728 N.Y.S.2d 376).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 22, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)