Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alberto MATOS, also known as Joseph Delarosa, Kiko de la Rosa, Jose Kiko, Roberto Matos, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Saratoga County (Scarano Jr., J.), rendered April 4, 2003, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree.
In satisfaction of a 19-count indictment and a pending petit larceny charge, defendant waived his right to appeal and pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree. Defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender in accordance with the plea agreement to a prison term of 10 1/212 years to life. On appeal, defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record and defendant's pro se submission, we disagree. Defendant raises an issue as to whether the pending petit larceny charge was dismissed in accordance with the plea agreement. Inasmuch as the record reveals at least one issue of arguable merit, defense counsel's application to be relieved of his assignment is granted and new counsel will be assigned to address any issues that the record may disclose (see People v. Stokes, 95 N.Y.2d 633, 636, 722 N.Y.S.2d 217, 744 N.E.2d 1153 [2001]; People v. Cruwys, 113 A.D.2d 979, 493 N.Y.S.2d 653 [1985], lv. denied 67 N.Y.2d 650, 499 N.Y.S.2d 1046, 490 N.E.2d 562 [1986] ).
ORDERED that the decision is withheld, application to be relieved of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 02, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)