Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Catherine E. CRONIN, a Suspended Attorney. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Catherine E. Cronin, Respondent.
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1985. She resides in the City of Binghamton, Broome County. By decision dated February 20, 2001, this Court suspended her from practice pending her compliance with an order which directed her to appear before petitioner for an examination under oath (see Matter of Cronin, 280 A.D.2d 874, 720 N.Y.S.2d 850 [2001] ).
Respondent now applies for reinstatement. Petitioner advises that it does not oppose reinstatement, but notes that respondent has failed to reimburse approximately $4,000 owed to three former clients.
We conclude that respondent has substantially complied with the provisions of the order which suspended her and with this Court's rules regulating the conduct of suspended attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 806.9). We are also satisfied that respondent has complied with the requirements of this Court's rules governing reinstatement (see 22 NYCRR 806.12) and that she possesses the character and fitness to resume the practice of law.
However, mindful of the particular circumstances presented by this application, we condition respondent's reinstatement as follows: for two years from the date of this decision, respondent shall submit to petitioner semiannual reports by her treating mental health professional evaluating her continuing capacity to practice law, with the first report due six months from the date of this decision (see e.g. Matter of Taylor, 13 A.D.3d 973, 786 N.Y.S.2d 364 [2004] ). Further, we direct respondent to submit to petitioner, within 30 days of the date of this decision, a plan for respondent's reimbursement of her clients (see e.g. Matter of Dixon, 306 A.D.2d 618, 759 N.Y.S.2d 899 [2003]; Matter of Cofino, 211 A.D.2d 298, 627 N.Y.S.2d 644 [1995]; Matter of Wojcik, 179 A.D.2d 868, 578 N.Y.S.2d 675 [1992] ). Petitioner shall report any failure to meet these conditions to this Court.
Accordingly, the application for reinstatement is granted and respondent is reinstated to practice, effective immediately, on the conditions set forth herein.
ORDERED that respondent's application is granted and she is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law of the State of New York, upon the conditions set forth in this decision, effective immediately.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 02, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)