Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Bernabe ENCARNACION, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Southport Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with making false statements and refusing a direct order. Following a tier II disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of both charges. After an administrative appeal, the determination was affirmed. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination.
The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the nurse who investigated the matter, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Price v. Goord, 29 A.D.3d 1203, 1204, 814 N.Y.S.2d 409 [2006]; Matter of Vizcaino v. Selsky, 26 A.D.3d 574, 808 N.Y.S.2d 825 [2006], lv. denied 7 N.Y.3d 708, 821 N.Y.S.2d 813, 854 N.E.2d 1277 [2006] ). Petitioner's procedural objections are unpersuasive. Petitioner was not improperly denied a Spanish-speaking assistant as his records indicate that he speaks English (see 7 NYCRR 251-4.1[a] [1]; see also Matter of Encarnacion v. Goord, 34 A.D.3d 1175, 824 N.Y.S.2d 492 [2006] ). Furthermore, inasmuch as petitioner's non-inmate witness did not return the Hearing Officer's telephone call, petitioner was not deprived of his right to call witnesses (see Matter of Williams v. Goord, 242 A.D.2d 842, 662 N.Y.S.2d 617 [1997] ). The record demonstrates that the hearing was conducted in a fair and impartial manner and the determination did not flow from any alleged bias on the part of the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Cayenne v. Goord, 16 A.D.3d 782, 783-784, 790 N.Y.S.2d 762 [2005]; Matter of Sanchez v. Selsky, 8 A.D.3d 846, 846, 778 N.Y.S.2d 561 [2004] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions, to the extent preserved, have been reviewed and determined to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 08, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)